Some 'Stuff' to Improve On

Randys-radar-masthead-08-2-with-bottom-bar-lange
Randy's Radar

Some 'Stuff' to Improve On

Published: Mon, June 25, 2007 - 1:50pm EDT
Randy Lange

By Randy Lange

Lange is editor-in-chief of newyorkjets.com. He covered the Jets for 13 years for The Record of Hackensack, N.J.


File Under: Jets, David Harris, Jonathan Vilma, Stuffs

06/25 — It's late June and many of us are planning to scatter for the oceans, the mountains, the city, the country. And that includes most of the Jets' players and coaches, who will pack in one last stretch of down time before Training Camp II under head coach Eric Mangini.

But we're going to keep cranking out the content for you here at newyorkjets.com. We've got fun and funky features in the pipeline on players' off-season plans and profiles on the members of our new, yet-to-be-named flag crew.

And with this blog, I'm kicking off a twice-weekly feature for the next four weeks that we can call "The Trendy AFC East." I'll take each team in the division and go over two trends it either established or extended last season, one downward drift that it wants to turn around in 2007 and one upward tendency that it wants to keep building on.

For starters, let's take the Jets' defense and its penchant for (not) making tackles behind the line of scrimmage. The Green & White was one of the bottom "D's" in the NFL in this category.

First, though, we should define terms. "Stuff" is the word that Stats Inc. and others use to mean a tackle for a loss on a running play. Nothing wrong with that definition, except that it's one of several ways to measure how often a defense spends time in the other teams' backfield.

For example, for more than a decade I've charted the Jets' "tackles for loss/no gain." The reason for the "no gain" part is that then the stat coincides with the criteria for sacks — a sack is credited whenever a QB is taken down at or behind the line of scrimmage, so zero-yard sacks do occur. And I've included in that charting tackles at or behind the line on pass completions, not as frequent as TFLNG's on runs but equally devastating to offensive continuity.

But "stuffs" it is for this conversation, and so we can say this about the 2006 Jets: They were among the least successful in the NFL with 25 tackles for loss on running plays. In fact, they were tied with two other teams for last in the league. And according to Stats Inc., those 25 TFL's are the fewest in a season since the independent group started recording the statistic in 1994.

Here are the lowest unofficial totals in the league last season:

  Rank Team TFLs Yds Lost 
  32 JETS 25 52 
    New England 25 43 
    San Diego 25 55 
  29 Dallas 26 63 
  28 Washington 27 53 
    Green Bay 27 39 

You may notice that the list is top-heavy with 3-4 playoff teams and you could say that those read-and-react type fronts don't have as many opportunities to play behind the line as do those one-gapping 4-3s.

But the Jets have been a 4-3 as well as a 3-4 for the past 10 seasons, and neither alignment has led to the Green & White making a ton of TFLs —the Jets in the last decade have averaged 36.5 stuffs per year, which easily ranks as the lowest in the league.

Yet there are reasons for the Green & White could be registering an uptick in this category soon. One is the introduction of second-round ILB David Harris to the equation — he had 14 stuffs as a Michigan senior. Anthony Schlegel, in his second year as a Jet, was also good at the point of attack at Ohio State.

And another is the general progress in Year 2 of Mangini's and DC Bob Sutton's scheme. As Jonathan Vilma said before the playoff game at New England: "We're confident about ourselves individually and confident about our defense. We know we can stop anybody down the road."

  4.16/5 : Rate this Post
25 ratings submitted

Fans Respond

Here's your chance to tell Randy what you think! Add a Comment | Show All (21)

Jesse Said:

Wed, June 27, 2007 - 10:59pm EDT

"The Jets defense will be a whole lot better year two in the 3-4. Sure the Jets was terrible with TFL's, but they're one of the top ten team's last year to give up the fewest points end the end zone. Harris & Revis is just going to compliment the D even more."

Offensive Comment?

Dunnie Said:

Thu, June 28, 2007 - 7:46am EDT

"I agree the JETS will be much better in year two of the scheme. I think that the addition of Harris should help Vilma immensly. He needs help in the middle and I think Harris is the key. VIlma should be freed up to wreak more havok this year. I hope D Rob continues his progress this year."

Offensive Comment?

ACCJakster Said:

Wed, July 4, 2007 - 7:04pm EDT

"Why did we release Jesse Allen? Its too bad he wasnt looked at under "live" conditions. The kid was a real slobber-knocker for VT. I'm wondering if Barnes will cut it as a lead blocker type. Are we looking for an offensive weapon type of fullback or a blocking fully? I wonder how TJ see's it."

Offensive Comment?